SEARCH
🇬🇧
MEM
O
RY
.COM
4.37.48
Guest
Log In
Homepage
0
0
0
0
0
Create Course
Courses
Last Played
Dashboard
Notifications
Classrooms
Folders
Exams
Custom Exams
Help
Leaderboard
Shop
Awards
Forum
Friends
Subjects
Dark mode
User ID: 999999
Version: 4.37.48
www.memory.com
You are in browse mode. You must login to use
MEM
O
RY
Log in to start
Index
»
I/OP Chapter 13
»
Chapter 1
»
Level 1
level: Level 1
Questions and Answers List
level questions: Level 1
Question
Answer
an event that affects one member of a group will affect the other group members
Corresponding effects
an aim or purpose shared by members of a group
goal
sending employees to work in different countries
expatriates
the need to associate ourselves with the image projected by other people, groups of objects
identification
when the football team won, the students answered by saying, “we won” when the team lost, the students answered by saying, "They lost."
Basking in reflected glory
extent to which group members like and trust one another, are committed to accomplishing a team goal and share a feeling of group pride
group cohesiveness
contain members who are similar in some ways or most ways
homogeneous group
contain members who are more different than alike
heterogeneous
groups in which a few group members have different characteristics from the rest of the group
slightly heterogeneous group
extent to which the membership of a group remaining consistent over time
Stability of membership
degree of physical distance of a group from other groups
isolation
amount of psychological pressure placed on a group by people who are not members of the group
outside pressure
the number of member in a group
group size
tasks for which the group’s performance is equal to the sum of the performances of each individual group
additive task
tasks for which the group’s performance is dependent on the performance of the least effective group member
conjunctive task
tasks for which the performance of a group is based on the performance of its most talented member
disjunctive task
states that the addition of a group member has the greatest effect on group behavior when the size of the group is small
social impact theory
esteem in which the group is held by people not in the group
group status
believe that their team can be successful at a specific task
high team efficacy
believe that their team can be successful in general
high team potency
manner in which members of a group communicate with one another
communication structure
behaviors such as offering new ideas, coordinating activities and finding new information
task oriented roles
involve cohesiveness and participation
social oriented roles
includes blocking group activities, calling attention to oneself and avoiding group interaction
individual roles
positive effects of the presence of others on an individual's behavior (+)
social facilitations
negative effects of others presence (-)
social inhibition
effect on behavior when one or more people passively watch the behavior of another person
audience effect
effect on behavior when two or more people are performing the same task in the presence of each other
coaction
effect when an individual working on a task compares his/her performance with that of another person performing the same task
comparison
idea that a person performing a task becomes aroused because he or she is concerned that others are evaluating his/her performance
evaluation apprehension
idea that social inhibition occurs because the presence of others provides a distraction that interferes with concentration
distracting
fact that individuals in a group often exert less individual effort than they would if they were not in a group
social loafing
postulates that when things are going well, a group member realizes that his effort is not necessary and thus does not work as hard as he would if he were alone
free-rider theory
hypothesizes that social loafing occurs when a group member notices that other group members are not working hard
sucker effect
state of mind in which a group is so concerned about its own cohesiveness that it ignores important information
groupthink
group member who intentionally provides an opposing opinion to that expressed by the leader or the majority
devil's advocate
collection of individuals whose results are pooled but who never interact with one another
nominal group
collection of individuals who work together to perform a task
interacting group
ideas are generated by people in a group setting
brainstroming
suggests that group members will shift their beliefs to a more extreme version of what they already believe individually (that is, if individual group members are on the risky side, the group will make highly risky decisions)
group polarization
a collection of three or more individuals who interact intensively to provide an organizational product, plan, decision or service
work team
the extent to which group members identify with the team rather than with other groups
identification
extent to which team members need and rely on other team members
interdependence
extent to which team members have the same level of power and respect
power differentiation
extent to which team members treat each other in a friendly, informal manner
social distance
extent to which a team will remain together or be disbanded after a task has been accomplished
permanency
groups of employees who manage themselves, assign jobs, plan and schedule work, make work-related decisions and solve work-related problems
work teams
groups of “expert specialists have specific role positions, perform brief events that are closely synchronized with each other and repeat those events access different environmental condition
crew
consist of representatives from various departments (functions) within an organization. cross-functional teams
parallel teams
formed produce one time outputs such as creating anew products, installing a new software system or hiring a new employee
project teams
coordinate manage, advice and direct employees and teams
management teams
Forming stage, storming stage, norming stage, performing stage
influential theory of team development
members get to know each other and decide what roles each member will play
forming stage
the good behavior disappears; group members disagree and resist their team roles
storming stage
establish roles and determine policies and procedures
norming stage
work towards accomplishing their goals
performing stage
an alternate theory suggests that rather than filming in stages, teams develop direction and strategy in the first meeting, follow this direction for a period of times and then drastically revise their strategy about halfway through the life of the team
purchased equilibrium
psychological and behavioral reaction to a perception that another person is keeping you from reaching a goal, taking away your right behave in a particular or violating the expectancies of a relationship
group conflict
conflict that keeps people from working together, lessens productivity, spreads to other areas or increases turnover
dysfunctional conflict
conflict that results in increased performance or better interpersonal relations
functional conflict
occur when the demand for resources is greater than the resources available
competition for resources
when the completion of a task by one person affect the completion of a task by another person
task interdependence
physical cultural and psychological obstacles that interfere with successful communication and create a source of conflict
communication barriers
obsessed with completing a task and take great pride in getting a job done quickly
high needs for control
who gets things done quickly by giving orders, being pushy, yelling and at times being too aggressive
tank
who controls people by using sarcasm, embarrassment and humiliation
sniper
controls others by dominating conversations, not listening to others; ideas and rejecting arguments counter to her position
know-it-all
obsessed with completing a task correctly
high needs for perfection
constantly complains about the situation but never they change it
whiner
believes that nothing will ever worth and thus disagrees with every suggestion/idea
no person
responds to difficult situations by doing and saying nothing - simply gives up / retreats
nothing person
obsessed with being liked
high needs for approval
agrees to everything and as a person result, often agrees to do so much that she cannot keep her commitments
yes person
avoids conflicts by never taking a stand on any issue
maybe person
obsessed with being appreciated
high needs for attention
throws a tantrum: yells, swears, rants and raves
grenade
poking fun at others
friendly sniper
exaggerates lies and gives unwanted advice to gain attention
thinks they know it all