| Loftus and Palmer background | eyewitnesses |
| cognitive area is measured by | lab experiments |
| experiment 1 lftp | 45 student university of washington
5 verbs - smashed , collided,bumped,hit,contacted,
how fast they were and the perception of the verb |
| resuls lftp ex 1 | 40.8-smashed contacted -31.8 |
| lftp ex2 | smashed glass
150 students 4s of car accidents |
| explanation of results sc | one memory - reconstructive hypothesis |
| Grant aim | context depending memory |
| grant ppts | 39 participants opportunity sample |
| grant summary | matching contect - silent - s -n n-n s-n n-s
on psychoimmunology
tested with short answer recall 10
multiple choice 16
condition - headphones |
| grant results | matching context lead to better results but you can't replicate real exam conditions |
| what makes psychology a science | - quan data
-replicable
-high control |
| back ground for moray | cocktail party affect |
| method for mor | 3 lab experiments |
| pptps mor | unkown ex 1
ex2-12
ex 3-14
england, opportunity |
| ex 1 mor | repeat shadowed message - alice in wonderland
and reject rejected - word lists
asked to do a recognition test |
| ex 2 mor | if name affected the attentionial barrier |
| ex 3 mor | if digits affected the attentional barrier |
| results for moray | ex1- 70% shadowed 27% rejected
ex2- 20/39 times heard with name
ex3 - no sig dif |
| Simon and Chubris background | police offer wrongly beaten |
| simon and chubris aim | inattentional blindess |
| method for sc | lab - imd - transparent or opaque
-umbrella woman or gorilla
-easy or hard
-black or white
- count bounce then areaial |
| ppts for sc | 192 harvard uo volunteering |
| results for sc | noticed - 67% opaque
65% gorilla when looking at b team
uw - 75% |
