SEARCH
You are in browse mode. You must login to use MEMORY

   Log in to start

level: Nomothetic and Idiographic

Questions and Answers List

level questions: Nomothetic and Idiographic

QuestionAnswer
What is the idiographic approach?Focus on the individual case to understand behaviour, unique people with subjective experiences. One individual or one group to provide in-depth understanding
Methods used for the idiographic method?Qualitative research, highly specific data, case studies, unscientific
What is the nomothetic approach?Attempts to study human behaviour to develop a general principles and universal laws, benchmark for comparison. Large groups with the aim of discovering norms and laws of behaviour
What are the methods used for the nomothetic approach?Quantitative research, large scale data collected, structured and controlled research, classifying people into groups
A strength of the idiographic approach?-Complete understanding of an individual -In-depth qualitative methods which can be used to shed light onto or generate new laws of behaviour -EG: Phineas Gage case study helped psychologist between understand localisation of function. -Although it is a more limited way of working, it can inform scientific laws and practice.
A weakness of the idiographic approach?-Narrow and restrictive way of working -Without gathering further examples for case studies, no meaningful conclusions can be drawn -Case studies are often subjective and prone to researcher bias -Lack of scientific rigour makes it difficult to build effective theories of human behaviour
A strength of the nomothetic approach?-More scientific approach -Processes involved are similar to natural sciences - standardisation, controlled, statistical testing etc -Objective methods/large samples allow us to establish norms and produce resources like the DSM -Makes it easier to diagnose psychopathology, understand human behaviour and gives us more scientific credibility
A weakness of the nomothetic approach?-Leads to the loss of understanding for the individual -Focusing on general laws of behaviour, we can miss important details and unique differences -Knowing for example 1% overall lifetime risk of developing SZ tells us little about the subjective experience of living with it -Therefore, it can overlook the richness of human data and miss out on important individualities.