History MYE
🇬🇧
In English
In English
Practice Known Questions
Stay up to date with your due questions
Complete 5 questions to enable practice
Exams
Exam: Test your skills
Test your skills in exam mode
Learn New Questions
Popular in this course
Learn with flashcards
Manual Mode [BETA]
Select your own question and answer types
Other available modes
Complete the sentence
Listening & SpellingSpelling: Type what you hear
multiple choiceMultiple choice mode
SpeakingAnswer with voice
Speaking & ListeningPractice pronunciation
TypingTyping only mode
History MYE - Details
Levels:
Questions:
113 questions
| 🇬🇧 | 🇬🇧 |
| What years were the Korean war | 1950-1953 |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| Background for the Korean war | Korea was ruled by Japan until 1945. At the end of the second world war the north remained communist controlled, with a communist leader. The south was anti communist, it wasn't very democratic but it was anti enough to gain the support of the USA. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| Pre/start of the Korean war | In 1950 open warfare started, northern troops (communist) overwhelmed the souths (anticommunist) forces. By September 1950 all except a small corner of south east Korea was under communist control |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| USA's involvement in the Korean War (getting the UN involved) | Truman immediately sent advisers, supplies and warships to Korea. He knew he needed the support of the UN so he put pressure on them to condemn the actions of the North Koreans and withdraw troops. The USA was the single biggest contributor to the UN budget and therefore had the biggest influence. Normally, the Soviet Union would have used their veto to block the call for action by the UN. However they were boycotting the UN at this time over another issue. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| USA's effect on the North Korea | UN troops stormed ashore in September 1950, at the same time UN forces and South Korean troops advanced. The north Koreans were driven back past their original boarder |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| UN forces continue to press on in Korea | MacArthur quickly achieved the original goal of the UN of removing removing North Korean troops from South Korea, but the Americans did not stop. Despite warnings from China that if they continued they would join the war, the UN approved a plan to advance into North Korea. By October, US forces had reached the Yalu River and the border with China. It was clear that MacArthur and Truman wanted to remove communism from Korea fully. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| The UN force retreats in Korea | MacArthur underestimated the power of the Chinese. Late in 1950, 200,000 Chinese troops joined the North Koreans and attacked. They had soldiers who were strongly committed to Communism and had been taught to hate the Americans. The United Nations forces were pushed back into South Korea. Conditions were some of the worst the American forces had known. The Chinese forces were more familiar with fighting in these conditions. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| MacArthur gets sacked | Truman and MacArthur fell out. MacArthur wanted to carry on the war. He was ready to invade China and even use nuclear weapons if needed. Truman, felt that saving South Korea was good enough. The UN convinced Truman that an attack on China was too risky. However, in March 1951 MacArthur blatantly ignored the UN and threatened an attack on China. In April Truman fired MacArthur as he rejected his aggressive policy towards Communism. Truman effectively returned to the policy of containment and accepted that he could not drive the Communists out of North Korea. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| Peace talks in Korea | The fighting finally reached stalemate around the 38th parallel in the middle of 1951. Peace talks between North and South Korea began in June 1951, although bitter fighting continued for two more years. The casualties on all sides were immense particularly among civilians. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| Armistice in Korea | In 1952 Truman was replaced by Eisenhower, who wanted to end the war. Stalin's death in 1953 made the Chinese and North Koreans less confident, so an armistice was signed in July 1953. The border was pretty much the same as when the war started |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| Advantages and disadvantages of the Korean war for the USA | The cost and the casualties were high but it showed that the USA had the will and the means to contain Communism. South Korea remained out of Communist hands. But it showed the limits of the policy. The USA had to accept that North Korea remained Communist. It also highlighted tensions among American leaders. Hardline anti-Communist politicians and military leaders wanted to go beyond containment - to push back Communism and thought that Truman had shown weakness in not going for outright victory. |
| Threats from the left | Sparta |
| About Cuba and Batista | Cuba had been an American ally for a long time, American's owned most of the businesses there and had a massive naval base. The Americans also provided the Cuban ruler, Batista economic and military support. Batista was a dictator and was hated among Cubans but were liked by Americans as he was very anti-communist. |
| Enter Fidel Castro | There was plenty of opposition to Batista in Cuba itself. In 1959, after a three-year campaign, Fidel Castro overthrew Batista. Castro was charming, clever but ruthless. He quickly killed, arrested or exiled many political opponents. Castro was also a clever propagandist. He was very charismatic, and he had a vision for a better Cuba which won over the majority of Cubans. |
| American reaction to Castro being leader | The USA was taken by surprise at first and decided to recognize Castro as the new leader of Cuba. But within a short period of time, relations between the two countries grew worse. There were thousands of Cuban exiles in the USA who had fled from Castro's rule. They formed powerful pressure groups demanding action against Castro. Castro took over some American-owned businesses in Cuba and distributed it to his supporters among Cuba's peasant farmer population. |
| America’s hostile approach towards Castro | June 1960, Eisenhower authorised the US CIA to investigate ways of overthrowing Castro. The CIA provided support and funds to Cuban exiles and investigated ways to disrupt the Cuban economy. American companies working in Cuba refused to co-operate with any Cuban businesses which materials imported from the USSR. The American media also broadcast a relentless stream of criticism of Castro and his regime. |
| Castros response to Americas hostility | Castro had a mixed approach. He assured Americans living in Cuba that they were safe and he allowed the USA to keep its naval base. He said he simply wanted to run Cuba without interference. However, by the summer of 1960 he had allied Cuba with the Soviet Union. Soviet leader Khrushchev signed a trade agreement giving Cuba $100 million in economic aid. Castro also began receiving arms from the Soviet Union and American spies knew this. |
| America's potential invasion of Cuba | In January 1961 the USA's new President, Kennedy, broke off diplomatic relations with Cuba. Castro thought that the USA was preparing to invade his country. The Americans did not invade directly, but Kennedy was no longer prepared to tolerate a Soviet satellite in the USA's 'sphere of influence'. The plans to overthrow Castro which were begun under Eisenhower began to take shape |
| The bay of pigs | Instead of a direct invasion, President Kennedy supplied arms, equipment and transport for 1,400 anti-Castro exiles to invade Cuba and overthrow Castro. In April 1961 the exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs. They were met by 20,000 Cuban troops, armed with tanks and modern weapons. The invasion failed disastrously. Castro captured or killed them all within days. |
| The impact of the invasion on Cuba | The half-hearted invasion suggested to Cuba and the Soviet Union that, despite its opposition to Communism in Cuba, the USA was unwilling to get directly involved in Cuba. Khrushchev was scornful of Kennedy's pathetic attempt to out Communism from Cuba. Historians too argue that the Bay of Pigs fiasco further strengthened Castro's position in Cuba. It suggested to the USSR that Kennedy was weak. It also made Castro and Khrushchev very suspicious of US policy. |
| Khrushchev arms Castro | After the Bay of Pigs Soviet arms flooded into Cuba. In May 1962 the Soviet Union announced publicly for the first time that it was supplying Cuba with arms. By July 1962 Cuba had the best-equipped army in Latin America. By September it had thousands of Soviet missiles, plus many other weapons and 5,000 Soviet technicians to help to maintain them. |
| Nuclear missiles or not in Cuba | America was concerned but willing to tolerate conventional arms in Cuba. The main issue was whether the Soviet Union would place nuclear missiles there, which seemed unlikely due to the risks. On September 11th, Kennedy warned the USSR against making Cuba a nuclear base. The USSR assured the USA that it had no need or intention of deploying nuclear missiles in Cuba. |
| The October crisis | On October 14, 1962, an American spy plane photographed nuclear missile sites in Cuba, built by the USSR. Further photos confirmed some sites were nearly complete, while others were still under construction. Some sites already had missiles, and experts estimated the most advanced could be operational in seven days. Additionally, spy planes reported twenty Soviet ships coming to Cuba carrying missiles. |
| 4the blockade against Cuba | President Kennedy was informed of the missile build-up in Cuba and announced a blockade, demanding the Soviet Union withdraw its missiles. Khrushchev responded that Soviet ships would not observe the blockade but did not confirm the missiles' presence. As the blockade began, missile-carrying ships and a Soviet submarine neared the blockade zone. However, at 10:32 a.m., the twenty Soviet ships closest to the zone stopped or turned around. |
| The first letter from Khrushchev | Despite the Soviet ships turning around, photography showed rapid progress on the missile bases in Cuba. Kennedy received a letter from Khrushchev stating the missiles were defensive. Khrushchev suggested that if the USA assured it would not attack Cuba and lifted the blockade, the removal or destruction of the missile sites could be considered. This was Khrushchev's first admission of the missiles' presence |
| The second letter from Khrushchev | Khrushchev sent another letter stating that the removal of missiles from Cuba was conditional on the USA withdrawing its missiles from Turkey. An American plane was shot down over Cuba, killing the pilot. Despite advice to launch an immediate attack, Kennedy delayed and decided to ignore the second letter. Instead, he accepted Khrushchev's terms from October 26, warning that if the Soviet Union did not withdraw, an attack would follow. |
| Why did the Soviet Union place nuclear missiles on Cuba | The USSR must have known that it would cause a crisis. They had no attempt at all to camouflage the sites, and even allowed the missiles to travel on open deck. This has caused much debate as to what Khrushchev was really doing. Some explanations include, to bargain with USA, to test the USA, to trap the USA, to close the missile gap, to defend cuba, to strengthen his own position in the USA |
| To bargain with the USA reasoning explained | If Khrushchev had missiles on Cuba, he could agree to remove them in return for some American concessions. |
| To test the USA reasoning explained | In the strained atmosphere of Cold War politics the missiles were designed to see how strong the Americans really were - whether they would back off or face up. |
| To trap the USA reasoning explained | Khrushchev wanted the Americans to find them and be drawn into a nuclear war. He did not even try to hide them. |
| To close the missile gap reasoning explained | Khrushchev was so concerned about the missile gap between the USSR and the USA that he would seize any opportunity he could to close it. With missiles on Cuba it was less likely that the USA would ever launch a first strike' against the USSR. |
| To defend cuba reasoning explained | Cuba was the only Communist state in the Western hemisphere, and it had willingly become Communist, rather than having become Communist as a result of invasion by the USSR. Just by existing, Castro's Cuba was excellent propaganda for the USSR. |
| To strengthen his own position in the USSR reasoning explained | The superiority of the USA in nuclear missiles undermined Khrushchev's credibility inside the USSR. His critics pointed out that he was the one who had urged the USSR to rely on nuclear missiles. Now, could he show that the USSR really was a nuclear power? |
| What years were the vietnam war | 1955-1975 |
| Background of Vietnam | Vietnam was ruled by France, whose harsh treatment led to the rise of the Viet Minh under communist leader Ho Chi Minh. In 1945, as the French sought to reclaim control from Japan, Ho resisted, leading to nine years of fighting. The Viet Minh controlled the North, while the French held much of the South. Despite $500 million annually in U.S. support, the French were unable to maintain control and withdrew in 1954. A peace conference in Geneva resulted in Vietnam being divided into North and South until elections could be held. |
| USA gets involved before elections are held in Vietnam | Under the ceasefire terms, elections were to be held within two years to reunite Vietnam. However, in 1954, the USA prevented these elections, fearing a Communist victory. President Eisenhower believed that China and the USSR aimed to spread Communism, known as the domino theory. Determined to stop Communism in Vietnam, seen as the first domino, the Americans intervened. |
| Deim’s regime | In 1955, the USA supported Diem in establishing the Republic of South Vietnam due to his anti-Communist stance. However, Diem's regime was unpopular, treating peasants poorly, disrespecting Buddhists, and engaging in corruption by appointing family and supporters to power and refusing elections. Despite this, the USA provided around $1.6 billion in support during the 1950s. Diem was overthrown by his own military leaders in November 1963. |
| The emergence of the Viet Cong | The anti-Communist government actions increased support among the peasants for the Viet Cong. Viet Cong included South Vietnamese opponents of the government, but also Communist North Vietnamese, taking their orders from Ho Chi Minh. Peasants who did not support the Viet Cong faced intimidation and violence from them. |
| The start of the guerilla war | The Viet Cong also started a guerrilla war against the South Vietnamese government. Using the Ho Chi Minh trail they sent reinforcements and supplies to guerrilla fighters. These fighters attacked South Vietnamese government forces, officials and buildings. They slowly made the countryside unsafe for government forces. They also attacked American air force and supply bases. |
| South Vietnamese strategic plan after the beginning of the guirella warfare | The South Vietnamese moved peasant villages from Viet Cong-controlled areas to areas controlled by the South Vietnamese government. The Americans helped by supplying building materials, money, food and equipment for the villagers to build improved farms and houses. This policy backfired, as the peasants resented it — and corrupt officials pocketed money meant to buy supplies for the villagers. |
| US involvement in Vietnam escalates | By 1962 Kennedy was sending military personnel/advisors to help the South Vietnamese fight the Viet Cong. Kennedy said he wouldn’t just jump into a war. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963. His successor, Lyndon Johnson, was more prepared to commit to war. |
| The Tonkin gulf resolution | In August 1964, North Vietnamese patrol boats opened fire on US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. US Congress passed the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, giving Johnson power to take all measures to get security back basically meaning he could take USA into a war. |
| Operation Rolling Thunder | In February 1965 the US started a gigantic bombing campaign against North Vietnamese cities, factories, army bases and the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which continued for three years. On 8 March 1965, 3,500 US marines and combat troops, came ashore at Da Nang. The USA was now officially at war in Vietnam. |
| Why did the US send troops to Vietnam | Containment policy and domino theory, |
| Viet cong tactics and troops - guerilla warefare | Did not wear uniforms to make them more disguised, no known army base or headquarters, worked in small groups, attacked then disappeared into jungles villages or tunnels, aimed to wear down enemy soldiers, US soldiers lived in fear of booby traps, pits filled with sharpened bamboo stakes, 11% of US deaths were booby traps and 51% were ambushes or hand-to-hand combat, preferred close-quarter fighting because they knew Americans wouldn't risk bombing their own troops |
| Viet cong tactics and troops - civilians | Fighters were courteous and respectful to peasants and even helped them in the fields, but they were prepared to kill peasants who opposed them |
| Viet cong tactics and troops - supplies | Depended on supplies from the North Vietnamese through the Ho Chi Minh trails. US and South Vietnamese planes bombed constantly but 40,000 Vietnamese worked to keep it open at any cost |
| Viet cong tactics and troops - commitment | The total Viet Cong and North Vietnamese dead in the war estimated at 1 million, much higher than US however there were always replacement troops available, and they simply refused to give up |
| US tactics and troops - bombing | Was their main tactic bombing military, ho chi minh trail, vietnams neighbours - loas and cambodia who were sympathetic towards the viet cong, it damaged NVs war effort and supply routes, communists wouldn’t give up and still launched major assault on the south, civilian casualties helped turn vietnamese people against the americans |
| US tactics and troops - search and destroy | US commander general Westmoreland set up US bases in south Vietnam where helicopters full of troops would descend in a village and search and destroy any Viet Cong sources they found |
| US tactics and troops - search and destroy problems | Raids were often based on little information, inexperienced US troops often walked into traps, innocent villages were mistaken for viet cong strong holds - for every viet cong weapon captured there was a body count of 6 many being innocent civilians, pushed peasants towards supporting viet cong |
| US tactics and troops - chemical weapons | Agent orange - toxic “weed killer” sprayed from planes into jungles where viet cong hid, napalm - destroyed jungles where gurilles might hide and also burned through skin to bone, many civilians and children were also harmed by these |
| US tactics and troops - conscription and morale | In the early stages, most troops were professionals, so morale was high. However, as more soldiers were needed, conscription was introduced. From 1967, many conscripts were young men with no prior military experience and lacked the passion, leading to low morale. To address this, generals implemented a one-year term of service, but this backfired as soldiers left just as they gained experience. |
| The tet offensive | War was going well for US and SV from 1965-1967 killing large numbers of VC, early 1968 VC attacked over 100 cities and military targets, one VC commando unit tried capturing the US embassy in Saigon, US forces had to fight to regain control room by room, around 4500 viet cong fighters tied down a much larger US and SV force in saigon for 2 days |
| Why was the tet offensive bad for communists | Tet offensive was somewhat a disaster for communists as they hoped people would join them. VC lost around 10,00 experienced fighters and were badly weakened |
| Why was the tet offensive bad for US | Raised hard questions like, there was close to 500,000 troops in vietnam and USA was spending $20B a year so why were VC able to launch a massive attacked taking US forces by surprise, US and SV forces quickly retook the towns captured but they used lots of artillery and air power killing many civilians and destroying the ancient city of Hue was this right? |
| The peace movement in the USA - cost | War was draining money that could be used for better purpose in the USA and despite spending all the money USA didn’t seem close to winning the war |
| The peace movement in the USA - inequality | Drafting exposed racial inequality with 30% of African Americans compared to 19% of white Americans, 22% of US casualties were black Americans despite them only making up 11% of the total US force, Muhammad Ali refused to join the army as it went against his faith so he was stripped of his world title and his passport was removed, black power groups argued how they could fight for a country that discriminated against them |
| The peace movement in the USA - purpose | Most damaging of all, an increasing number of Americas felt deeply uncomfortable about what was going on in Vietnam |
| Americans wondering what they were fighting for | Many reporters and photographers sent photos back to the USA of the fighting. Newspapers showed crying children being burned by napalm bombs and many other horrific casualties. This was shocking to the average American because was this why 900,000 young Americans had been drafted? Vietnam had become a symbol of defeat, confusion and moral corruption |
| Protests against the Vietnam War | Anti-war protests, led by students and civil rights campaigners, peaked between 1968 and 1970. Over 100 demonstrations involved 40,000 students, often featuring the burning of the American flag, a criminal offence. Students taunted President Johnson with chants. In late 1969, nearly 700,000 anti-war protesters gathered in Washington, DC, marking the largest political protest in American history. |
| The my lai massacre - how did it happen and why | In March 1968 a unit of soilders called Charlie's Company started a search and destroy mission. They were told that there was a VC headquarters in my lai and 200 VC guerillas. They were ordered to destroy everything, as villagers were all supposed to be at the market. March 16 they arrived and within the next 4 hours 300–400 civilians were killed. Most were women, children and old men, some were killed in the fields, some at home. Many were mowed down by machine gunfire as they were herded into an irrigation ditch. No VC were found. |
| The my lai massacre - the letter | At the time it was a success, with the commanding officer's report saying 20 non-combatants were accidentally killed, with the rest recorded as VC. 12 months later a letter arrived in a head office in Washington written by a soldier who served in Vietnam and knew many of the soldiers taking part in the massacre and had evidence something not right had happened and asked congress to investigate |
| The my lai massacre - investigation | Soon after, life magazine published photos of the MLM taken by an army photographer, this started an investigation ending in a trial for mass murder of Luitenanat William Calley he was an officer in CC and shot many people. in September 1969 he was formally charged with murdering 109 people. Ten other members were also charged. |
| The my lai massacre - aftermath | Outcomes were shocking to Americans, the charges were overwhelming for the army, so they placed the blame on calley saying that he was acting under orders and his senior officers were found not guilty. After a court case with lots of media, he was found guilty of murder of 22 civilians. In August 1971 he was sentenced to 20 years hard labour |
| Ending the war in vietnam | After the Tet Offensive Johnson concluded they couldn’t win the war militarily and officials began negotiating for peace, he also announced he wouldn't seek re-election as an admission of failure and both new candidates said they would try to end the war. It was now a question of how to get out of the war without looking defeated |
| A new president tries to end US involvement in vietnam war | Nixon was elected and his nation security adviser worked to end US involvement in the war but it was hard because they didn’t want to appear to hand Vietnam to the communists |
| Peace treaty in vietnam | In pairs January 1973 all parties signed a peace agreement and by March 1973 all american forces had left Vietnam, within 2 years south Vietnam had fallen to the communists. women and children tried to clamber aboard American helicopters which was a bleak image. after 30 years of conflict communists had won |
| How vietnam was a failure for the US | Failed militarily - not even the US military power could stop the spread of communism failed strategically - the bombing also turned loas and cambodians against democracy and by 1975 they both had communists governments propaganda disaster - the americans were seen to be propping up a government that didn’t had the support of its own people |
| How vietnam was a success for the US | Improved relations with China and the Soviet union that by the 1970s they both got along with the US better than they got along with eachother, US also became suspicious of involving their troops in a conflict they couldn’t overwhelming win |
| Social impact of the war on germany | Huge gaps in the living standards of the rich and the poor, one and a half million demobilised soldiers returned to society |
| Economic impact of the war on germany | Industrial production AND national income was 2/3 of what it had been in 1913, war left 600,000 widows and 2 million children without fathers - by 1925 the state was spending 1/2 of its budget on war pensions |
| Political impact of the war on germany | Stresses of war led to a revolt in Oct - Nov 1918 with fighting between left and right wing groups, many ex-soldiers and civilians despised the new democratic leaders and believed that the heroic Field Marshal Hindenburg had been betrayed by weak politicians |
| What did the left wing want | A communist revolution |
| What did the right wing want | They wanted their kaiser back |
| Threats from the left | Spartacists led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg and made up of rebel soldiers and sailors. Spartacists launched their bid for power, but Ebert made an agreement with the army and the freikorps to end the rebellion. Street fighting and heavy casualties followed, but the freikorps won and Karl and Rosa were killed. Another rebellion happened in Bavaria but, Ebert used the same tactics and crushed the revolt in May 1919 with around 600 communists killed. In 1920 there was communist agitation in the Ruhr but this time with 2000 casualties |
| Threat from the right | Made up of some anti-communist ex-soldiers and people who were successful under the kaiser and resented the ToV and blamed ebert for agreeing too. In March 1920 Dr Wolfgang Kapp led 5000 freikorps into Berlin - this was known as the Kapp Putch. The army refused to fire on the Freikorps as they were veterans, and ebert thought he was doomed. A general strike was declared bringing Berlin to a halt and eventually Kapp realised he couldn't succeed and fled but was hunted down and died while awaiting trial |
| Terms of the Treaty of Versailles | Germany lost - 10% of its land, all of its overseas colonies, 12.5% of its population in addition - its army was reduced to 100,000, it wasn't allowed to have an air force, its navy was reduced, Germany had to accept blame and was forced to pay reparations |
| Who was to blame for the signing of the Treaty of Versailles | Ebert was reluctant to sign the Treaty but had no choice as Germany could not go to war, however Ebert and the Weimar were blamed for the treaty. Germans believed they had been betrayed by the governments who didn't dare to continue the war. The reparations bill was announced in April 1921 for 6600 million to be paid in early instalments of 2% of Germany's annual output. |
| The occupation of the Ruhr | In 1922, Germany failed to pay reparations. President Ebert tried negotiating, but France, needing to pay its war debts to the USA and lost patience. In January 1923, French and Belgian troops legally occupied the Ruhr to take reparations in raw materials and goods. The German government ordered a strike, but the French killed 100 workers and expelled 100,000 protesters. The strike halted industrial production, causing the collapse of the German currency. |
| Hyperinflation | Due to a lack of goods for trade, the Government resorted to printing money, paying off debts with worthless marks including war loans of over 2200 million. This led to hyperinflation making money practically worthless. Wages were paid daily instead of weekly. Middle-class Germans lost their savings' value rapidly as what could have bought a house in 1921, couldnt even buy a loaf of bread in 1923 |
| Stresseman came in to fix hyperinflation | The passive resistance in the Ruhr was ended. Worthless marks were called in and burned, replaced by the Rentenmark. American loans were secured under the Dawes Plan, and reparations payments were renegotiated. However, hyperinflation damaged the Weimar Government politically. Right-wing opponents blamed them for the crisis, linking it to the Treaty of Versailles and reparations. Many Germans never forgave the government. |
| Stresemanns achievements - the economy | Stresemann led Germany to prosperity through the Dawes Plan, which spread reparations and brought in US loans. Investments modernized industry and funded public works, creating jobs. By 1927, industry matched pre-war levels, making Germany the world's second-largest industrial power. Wages rose, living standards improved, and welfare benefits increased, driven by growing exports and stable finances. |
| Stresemanns achievements - politics | Politics stabilized after 1923, with no attempted revolutions. Pro-Weimar parties gained support, with moderate parties securing 136 more Reichstag seats than radical ones by 1928. Hitler's Nazis received less than 3% of the vote in the 1928 election. Some parties that had cooperated in the 1918 revolution resumed cooperation, indicating growing acceptance of the Weimar Republic. |
| Stresemanns achievements - culture | Cultural revival blossomed, fuelled by new freedoms of expression. Writers, poets, and artists flourished, particularly in Berlin. Some condemned political and business leaders, while other artworks depicted the traumas of war. The Bauhaus movement revolutionized design and architecture, rejecting tradition for innovation. German cinema thrived, introducing stars like Marlene Dietrich and directors like Fritz Lang. |
| Stresemanns achievements - foreign policy | Stresemann's foreign policy triumphs included signing the Locarno Treaties in 1925, ensuring stability by guaranteeing Germany's western borders. Germany's acceptance into the League of Nations in 1926 marked a diplomatic success. Quietly and steadily, Stresemann worked on reversing Treaty of Versailles terms, focusing on reparations and eastern frontiers. By his death in 1929, he negotiated the Young Plan, easing reparations, and secured the removal of foreign troops from the Rhineland. |
| Stresemanns failures - the economy | The economic boom in Weimar Germany was dependent on US loans, which could be recalled suddenly, leading to economic ruin. Workers in large industries saw improved pay and conditions, but rising unemployment, reaching 6% by 1928. Peasant farmers and parts of the middle class suffered, with overproduction and debt plaguing farmers, and small business owners feeling threatened by large department stores. |
| Stresemanns failures - politics | Despite relative political stability, Weimar Germany saw the growth of Nazi and Communist party organizations. Frequent changes in chancellors highlighted coalition fragility, while around 30% consistently voted against the Republic. Concerning, right-wing groups like the DNVP and Nazis collaborated, seeking respectability. |
| Stresemanns failures - culture | Weimar culture was vibrant to many, but for some in rural Germany, it symbolized moral decay. The Bauhaus design college relocated to Dessau due to hostility from Weimar officials. The Wandervogel movement emerged in response, advocating for a return to rural values and less urban decadence. This feeling was exploited later by the Nazis |
| Stresemanns failures - foreign policy | Stresemann faced criticism from nationalists for joining the League of Nations and signing the Locarno Pact, as it implied acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles. Communists also opposed Locarno, viewing it as a threat to the Soviet government. |