SEARCH
You are in browse mode. You must login to use MEMORY

   Log in to start

level: Level 1

Questions and Answers List

level questions: Level 1

QuestionAnswer
what years were the Korean war1950-1953
background for the Korean warKorea was ruled by Japan until 1945. At the end of the second world war the north remained communist controlled, with a communist leader. The south was anti communist, it wasn't very democratic but it was anti enough to gain the support of the USA.
pre/start of the Korean warin 1950 open warfare started, northern troops (communist) overwhelmed the souths (anticommunist) forces. By September 1950 all except a small corner of south east Korea was under communist control
USA's involvement in the Korean War (getting the UN involved)Truman immediately sent advisers, supplies and warships to Korea. He knew he needed the support of the UN so he put pressure on them to condemn the actions of the North Koreans and withdraw troops. The USA was the single biggest contributor to the UN budget and therefore had the biggest influence. Normally, the Soviet Union would have used their veto to block the call for action by the UN. However they were boycotting the UN at this time over another issue.
USA's effect on the North KoreaUN troops stormed ashore in September 1950, at the same time UN forces and South Korean troops advanced. The north Koreans were driven back past their original boarder
UN forces continue to press on in KoreaMacArthur quickly achieved the original goal of the UN of removing removing North Korean troops from South Korea, but the Americans did not stop. Despite warnings from China that if they continued they would join the war, the UN approved a plan to advance into North Korea. By October, US forces had reached the Yalu River and the border with China. It was clear that MacArthur and Truman wanted to remove communism from Korea fully.
the UN force retreats in KoreaMacArthur underestimated the power of the Chinese. Late in 1950, 200,000 Chinese troops joined the North Koreans and attacked. They had soldiers who were strongly committed to Communism and had been taught to hate the Americans. The United Nations forces were pushed back into South Korea. Conditions were some of the worst the American forces had known. The Chinese forces were more familiar with fighting in these conditions.
MacArthur gets sackedTruman and MacArthur fell out. MacArthur wanted to carry on the war. He was ready to invade China and even use nuclear weapons if needed. Truman, felt that saving South Korea was good enough. The UN convinced Truman that an attack on China was too risky. However, in March 1951 MacArthur blatantly ignored the UN and threatened an attack on China. In April Truman fired MacArthur as he rejected his aggressive policy towards Communism. Truman effectively returned to the policy of containment and accepted that he could not drive the Communists out of North Korea.
peace talks in KoreaThe fighting finally reached stalemate around the 38th parallel in the middle of 1951. Peace talks between North and South Korea began in June 1951, although bitter fighting continued for two more years. The casualties on all sides were immense particularly among civilians.
armistice in Koreain 1952 Truman was replaced by Eisenhower, who wanted to end the war. Stalin's death in 1953 made the Chinese and North Koreans less confident, so an armistice was signed in July 1953. The border was pretty much the same as when the war started
advantages and disadvantages of the Korean war for the USAThe cost and the casualties were high but it showed that the USA had the will and the means to contain Communism. South Korea remained out of Communist hands. But it showed the limits of the policy. The USA had to accept that North Korea remained Communist. It also highlighted tensions among American leaders. Hardline anti-Communist politicians and military leaders wanted to go beyond containment - to push back Communism and thought that Truman had shown weakness in not going for outright victory.
about Cuba and BatistaCuba had been an American ally for a long time, American's owned most of the businesses there and had a massive naval base. The Americans also provided the Cuban ruler, Batista economic and military support. Batista was a dictator and was hated among Cubans but were liked by Americans as he was very anti-communist.
enter Fidel CastroThere was plenty of opposition to Batista in Cuba itself. In 1959, after a three-year campaign, Fidel Castro overthrew Batista. Castro was charming, clever but ruthless. He quickly killed, arrested or exiled many political opponents. Castro was also a clever propagandist. He was very charismatic, and he had a vision for a better Cuba which won over the majority of Cubans.
American reaction to Castro being leaderThe USA was taken by surprise at first and decided to recognize Castro as the new leader of Cuba. But within a short period of time, relations between the two countries grew worse. There were thousands of Cuban exiles in the USA who had fled from Castro's rule. They formed powerful pressure groups demanding action against Castro. Castro took over some American-owned businesses in Cuba and distributed it to his supporters among Cuba's peasant farmer population.
America’s hostile approach towards CastroJune 1960, Eisenhower authorised the US CIA to investigate ways of overthrowing Castro. The CIA provided support and funds to Cuban exiles and investigated ways to disrupt the Cuban economy. American companies working in Cuba refused to co-operate with any Cuban businesses which materials imported from the USSR. The American media also broadcast a relentless stream of criticism of Castro and his regime.
Castros response to Americas hostilityCastro had a mixed approach. He assured Americans living in Cuba that they were safe and he allowed the USA to keep its naval base. He said he simply wanted to run Cuba without interference. However, by the summer of 1960 he had allied Cuba with the Soviet Union. Soviet leader Khrushchev signed a trade agreement giving Cuba $100 million in economic aid. Castro also began receiving arms from the Soviet Union and American spies knew this.
America's potential invasion of CubaIn January 1961 the USA's new President, Kennedy, broke off diplomatic relations with Cuba. Castro thought that the USA was preparing to invade his country. The Americans did not invade directly, but Kennedy was no longer prepared to tolerate a Soviet satellite in the USA's 'sphere of influence'. The plans to overthrow Castro which were begun under Eisenhower began to take shape
the bay of pigsinstead of a direct invasion, President Kennedy supplied arms, equipment and transport for 1,400 anti-Castro exiles to invade Cuba and overthrow Castro. In April 1961 the exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs. They were met by 20,000 Cuban troops, armed with tanks and modern weapons. The invasion failed disastrously. Castro captured or killed them all within days.
the impact of the invasion on CubaThe half-hearted invasion suggested to Cuba and the Soviet Union that, despite its opposition to Communism in Cuba, the USA was unwilling to get directly involved in Cuba. Khrushchev was scornful of Kennedy's pathetic attempt to out Communism from Cuba. Historians too argue that the Bay of Pigs fiasco further strengthened Castro's position in Cuba. It suggested to the USSR that Kennedy was weak. It also made Castro and Khrushchev very suspicious of US policy.
Khrushchev arms CastroAfter the Bay of Pigs Soviet arms flooded into Cuba. In May 1962 the Soviet Union announced publicly for the first time that it was supplying Cuba with arms. By July 1962 Cuba had the best-equipped army in Latin America. By September it had thousands of Soviet missiles, plus many other weapons and 5,000 Soviet technicians to help to maintain them.
Nuclear missiles or not in CubaAmerica was concerned but willing to tolerate conventional arms in Cuba. The main issue was whether the Soviet Union would place nuclear missiles there, which seemed unlikely due to the risks. On September 11th, Kennedy warned the USSR against making Cuba a nuclear base. The USSR assured the USA that it had no need or intention of deploying nuclear missiles in Cuba.
The October crisisOn October 14, 1962, an American spy plane photographed nuclear missile sites in Cuba, built by the USSR. Further photos confirmed some sites were nearly complete, while others were still under construction. Some sites already had missiles, and experts estimated the most advanced could be operational in seven days. Additionally, spy planes reported twenty Soviet ships coming to Cuba carrying missiles.
4the blockade against CubaPresident Kennedy was informed of the missile build-up in Cuba and announced a blockade, demanding the Soviet Union withdraw its missiles. Khrushchev responded that Soviet ships would not observe the blockade but did not confirm the missiles' presence. As the blockade began, missile-carrying ships and a Soviet submarine neared the blockade zone. However, at 10:32 a.m., the twenty Soviet ships closest to the zone stopped or turned around.
The first letter from KhrushchevDespite the Soviet ships turning around, photography showed rapid progress on the missile bases in Cuba. Kennedy received a letter from Khrushchev stating the missiles were defensive. Khrushchev suggested that if the USA assured it would not attack Cuba and lifted the blockade, the removal or destruction of the missile sites could be considered. This was Khrushchev's first admission of the missiles' presence
The second letter from KhrushchevKhrushchev sent another letter stating that the removal of missiles from Cuba was conditional on the USA withdrawing its missiles from Turkey. An American plane was shot down over Cuba, killing the pilot. Despite advice to launch an immediate attack, Kennedy delayed and decided to ignore the second letter. Instead, he accepted Khrushchev's terms from October 26, warning that if the Soviet Union did not withdraw, an attack would follow.
Why did the Soviet Union place nuclear missiles on CubaThe USSR must have known that it would cause a crisis. They had no attempt at all to camouflage the sites, and even allowed the missiles to travel on open deck. This has caused much debate as to what Khrushchev was really doing. Some explanations include, to bargain with USA, to test the USA, to trap the USA, to close the missile gap, to defend cuba, to strengthen his own position in the USA
to bargain with the USA reasoning explainedIf Khrushchev had missiles on Cuba, he could agree to remove them in return for some American concessions.
to test the USA reasoning explainedIn the strained atmosphere of Cold War politics the missiles were designed to see how strong the Americans really were - whether they would back off or face up.
to trap the USA reasoning explainedKhrushchev wanted the Americans to find them and be drawn into a nuclear war. He did not even try to hide them.
to close the missile gap reasoning explainedKhrushchev was so concerned about the missile gap between the USSR and the USA that he would seize any opportunity he could to close it. With missiles on Cuba it was less likely that the USA would ever launch a first strike' against the USSR.
to defend cuba reasoning explainedCuba was the only Communist state in the Western hemisphere, and it had willingly become Communist, rather than having become Communist as a result of invasion by the USSR. Just by existing, Castro's Cuba was excellent propaganda for the USSR.
to strengthen his own position in the USSR reasoning explainedThe superiority of the USA in nuclear missiles undermined Khrushchev's credibility inside the USSR. His critics pointed out that he was the one who had urged the USSR to rely on nuclear missiles. Now, could he show that the USSR really was a nuclear power?
What years were the vietnam war1955-1975
background of VietnamVietnam was ruled by France, whose harsh treatment led to the rise of the Viet Minh under communist leader Ho Chi Minh. In 1945, as the French sought to reclaim control from Japan, Ho resisted, leading to nine years of fighting. The Viet Minh controlled the North, while the French held much of the South. Despite $500 million annually in U.S. support, the French were unable to maintain control and withdrew in 1954. A peace conference in Geneva resulted in Vietnam being divided into North and South until elections could be held.
USA gets involved before elections are held in VietnamUnder the ceasefire terms, elections were to be held within two years to reunite Vietnam. However, in 1954, the USA prevented these elections, fearing a Communist victory. President Eisenhower believed that China and the USSR aimed to spread Communism, known as the domino theory. Determined to stop Communism in Vietnam, seen as the first domino, the Americans intervened.
Deim’s regimeIn 1955, the USA supported Diem in establishing the Republic of South Vietnam due to his anti-Communist stance. However, Diem's regime was unpopular, treating peasants poorly, disrespecting Buddhists, and engaging in corruption by appointing family and supporters to power and refusing elections. Despite this, the USA provided around $1.6 billion in support during the 1950s. Diem was overthrown by his own military leaders in November 1963.
The emergence of the Viet CongThe anti-Communist government actions increased support among the peasants for the Viet Cong. Viet Cong included South Vietnamese opponents of the government, but also Communist North Vietnamese, taking their orders from Ho Chi Minh. Peasants who did not support the Viet Cong faced intimidation and violence from them.
The start of the guerilla warThe Viet Cong also started a guerrilla war against the South Vietnamese government. Using the Ho Chi Minh trail they sent reinforcements and supplies to guerrilla fighters. These fighters attacked South Vietnamese government forces, officials and buildings. They slowly made the countryside unsafe for government forces. They also attacked American air force and supply bases.
South Vietnamese strategic plan after the beginning of the guirella warfareThe South Vietnamese moved peasant villages from Viet Cong-controlled areas to areas controlled by the South Vietnamese government. The Americans helped by supplying building materials, money, food and equipment for the villagers to build improved farms and houses. This policy backfired, as the peasants resented it — and corrupt officials pocketed money meant to buy supplies for the villagers.
US involvement in Vietnam escalatesBy 1962 Kennedy was sending military personnel/advisors to help the South Vietnamese fight the Viet Cong. Kennedy said he wouldn’t just jump into a war. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963. His successor, Lyndon Johnson, was more prepared to commit to war.
the Tonkin gulf resolutionIn August 1964, North Vietnamese patrol boats opened fire on US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. US Congress passed the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, giving Johnson power to take all measures to get security back basically meaning he could take USA into a war.
Operation Rolling ThunderIn February 1965 the US started a gigantic bombing campaign against North Vietnamese cities, factories, army bases and the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which continued for three years. On 8 March 1965, 3,500 US marines and combat troops, came ashore at Da Nang. The USA was now officially at war in Vietnam.
viet cong tactics and troops - guerilla warefaredid not wear uniforms to make them more disguised, no known army base or headquarters, worked in small groups, attacked then disappeared into jungles villages or tunnels, aimed to wear down enemy soldiers, US soldiers lived in fear of booby traps, pits filled with sharpened bamboo stakes, 11% of US deaths were booby traps and 51% were ambushes or hand-to-hand combat, preferred close-quarter fighting because they knew Americans wouldn't risk bombing their own troops
viet cong tactics and troops - civiliansfighters were courteous and respectful to peasants and even helped them in the fields, but they were prepared to kill peasants who opposed them
viet cong tactics and troops - suppliesdepended on supplies from the North Vietnamese through the Ho Chi Minh trails. US and South Vietnamese planes bombed constantly but 40,000 Vietnamese worked to keep it open at any cost
viet cong tactics and troops - commitmentthe total Viet Cong and North Vietnamese dead in the war estimated at 1 million, much higher than US however there were always replacement troops available, and they simply refused to give up
US tactics and troops - bombingwas their main tactic bombing military, ho chi minh trail, vietnams neighbours - loas and cambodia who were sympathetic towards the viet cong, it damaged NVs war effort and supply routes, communists wouldn’t give up and still launched major assault on the south, civilian casualties helped turn vietnamese people against the americans
US tactics and troops - search and destroyUS commander general Westmoreland set up US bases in south Vietnam where helicopters full of troops would descend in a village and search and destroy any Viet Cong sources they found
US tactics and troops - search and destroy problemsraids were often based on little information, inexperienced US troops often walked into traps, innocent villages were mistaken for viet cong strong holds - for every viet cong weapon captured there was a body count of 6 many being innocent civilians, pushed peasants towards supporting viet cong
US tactics and troops - chemical weaponsagent orange - toxic “weed killer” sprayed from planes into jungles where viet cong hid, napalm - destroyed jungles where gurilles might hide and also burned through skin to bone, many civilians and children were also harmed by these
US tactics and troops - conscription and moraleIn the early stages, most troops were professionals, so morale was high. However, as more soldiers were needed, conscription was introduced. From 1967, many conscripts were young men with no prior military experience and lacked the passion, leading to low morale. To address this, generals implemented a one-year term of service, but this backfired as soldiers left just as they gained experience.
the tet offensivewar was going well for US and SV from 1965-1967 killing large numbers of VC, early 1968 VC attacked over 100 cities and military targets, one VC commando unit tried capturing the US embassy in Saigon, US forces had to fight to regain control room by room, around 4500 viet cong fighters tied down a much larger US and SV force in saigon for 2 days
why was the tet offensive bad for communiststet offensive was somewhat a disaster for communists as they hoped people would join them. VC lost around 10,00 experienced fighters and were badly weakened
why was the tet offensive bad for USraised hard questions like, there was close to 500,000 troops in vietnam and USA was spending $20B a year so why were VC able to launch a massive attacked taking US forces by surprise, US and SV forces quickly retook the towns captured but they used lots of artillery and air power killing many civilians and destroying the ancient city of Hue was this right?
the peace movement in the USA - costwar was draining money that could be used for better purpose in the USA and despite spending all the money USA didn’t seem close to winning the war
the peace movement in the USA - inequalitydrafting exposed racial inequality with 30% of African Americans compared to 19% of white Americans, 22% of US casualties were black Americans despite them only making up 11% of the total US force, Muhammad Ali refused to join the army as it went against his faith so he was stripped of his world title and his passport was removed, black power groups argued how they could fight for a country that discriminated against them
the peace movement in the USA - purposemost damaging of all, an increasing number of Americas felt deeply uncomfortable about what was going on in Vietnam
Americans wondering what they were fighting formany reporters and photographers sent photos back to the USA of the fighting. Newspapers showed crying children being burned by napalm bombs and many other horrific casualties. This was shocking to the average American because was this why 900,000 young Americans had been drafted? Vietnam had become a symbol of defeat, confusion and moral corruption
protests against the Vietnam WarAnti-war protests, led by students and civil rights campaigners, peaked between 1968 and 1970. Over 100 demonstrations involved 40,000 students, often featuring the burning of the American flag, a criminal offence. Students taunted President Johnson with chants. In late 1969, nearly 700,000 anti-war protesters gathered in Washington, DC, marking the largest political protest in American history.
the my lai massacre - how did it happen and whyin March 1968 a unit of soilders called Charlie's Company started a search and destroy mission. They were told that there was a VC headquarters in my lai and 200 VC guerillas. They were ordered to destroy everything, as villagers were all supposed to be at the market. March 16 they arrived and within the next 4 hours 300–400 civilians were killed. Most were women, children and old men, some were killed in the fields, some at home. Many were mowed down by machine gunfire as they were herded into an irrigation ditch. No VC were found.
the my lai massacre - the letterat the time it was a success, with the commanding officer's report saying 20 non-combatants were accidentally killed, with the rest recorded as VC. 12 months later a letter arrived in a head office in Washington written by a soldier who served in Vietnam and knew many of the soldiers taking part in the massacre and had evidence something not right had happened and asked congress to investigate
the my lai massacre - investigationsoon after, life magazine published photos of the MLM taken by an army photographer, this started an investigation ending in a trial for mass murder of Luitenanat William Calley he was an officer in CC and shot many people. in September 1969 he was formally charged with murdering 109 people. Ten other members were also charged.
the my lai massacre - aftermathoutcomes were shocking to Americans, the charges were overwhelming for the army, so they placed the blame on calley saying that he was acting under orders and his senior officers were found not guilty. After a court case with lots of media, he was found guilty of murder of 22 civilians. In August 1971 he was sentenced to 20 years hard labour
ending the war in vietnamafter the Tet Offensive Johnson concluded they couldn’t win the war militarily and officials began negotiating for peace, he also announced he wouldn't seek re-election as an admission of failure and both new candidates said they would try to end the war. It was now a question of how to get out of the war without looking defeated
a new president tries to end US involvement in vietnam warNixon was elected and his nation security adviser worked to end US involvement in the war but it was hard because they didn’t want to appear to hand Vietnam to the communists
peace treaty in vietnamIn pairs January 1973 all parties signed a peace agreement and by March 1973 all american forces had left Vietnam, within 2 years south Vietnam had fallen to the communists. women and children tried to clamber aboard American helicopters which was a bleak image. after 30 years of conflict communists had won
how vietnam was a failure for the USfailed militarily - not even the US military power could stop the spread of communism failed strategically - the bombing also turned loas and cambodians against democracy and by 1975 they both had communists governments propaganda disaster - the americans were seen to be propping up a government that didn’t had the support of its own people
how vietnam was a success for the USimproved relations with China and the Soviet union that by the 1970s they both got along with the US better than they got along with eachother, US also became suspicious of involving their troops in a conflict they couldn’t overwhelming win
social impact of the war on germanyhuge gaps in the living standards of the rich and the poor, one and a half million demobilised soldiers returned to society
economic impact of the war on germanyindustrial production AND national income was 2/3 of what it had been in 1913, war left 600,000 widows and 2 million children without fathers - by 1925 the state was spending 1/2 of its budget on war pensions
political impact of the war on germanystresses of war led to a revolt in Oct - Nov 1918 with fighting between left and right wing groups, many ex-soldiers and civilians despised the new democratic leaders and believed that the heroic Field Marshal Hindenburg had been betrayed by weak politicians
what did the left wing wanta communist revolution
what did the right wing wantthey wanted their kaiser back
threats from the leftSpartacists led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg and made up of rebel soldiers and sailors. Spartacists launched their bid for power, but Ebert made an agreement with the army and the freikorps to end the rebellion. Street fighting and heavy casualties followed, but the freikorps won and Karl and Rosa were killed. Another rebellion happened in Bavaria but, Ebert used the same tactics and crushed the revolt in May 1919 with around 600 communists killed. In 1920 there was communist agitation in the Ruhr but this time with 2000 casualties
threat from the rightMade up of some anti-communist ex-soldiers and people who were successful under the kaiser and resented the ToV and blamed ebert for agreeing too. In March 1920 Dr Wolfgang Kapp led 5000 freikorps into Berlin - this was known as the Kapp Putch. The army refused to fire on the Freikorps as they were veterans, and ebert thought he was doomed. A general strike was declared bringing Berlin to a halt and eventually Kapp realised he couldn't succeed and fled but was hunted down and died while awaiting trial
Terms of the Treaty of VersaillesGermany lost - 10% of its land, all of its overseas colonies, 12.5% of its population in addition - its army was reduced to 100,000, it wasn't allowed to have an air force, its navy was reduced, Germany had to accept blame and was forced to pay reparations
Who was to blame for the signing of the Treaty of VersaillesEbert was reluctant to sign the Treaty but had no choice as Germany could not go to war, however Ebert and the Weimar were blamed for the treaty. Germans believed they had been betrayed by the governments who didn't dare to continue the war. The reparations bill was announced in April 1921 for 6600 million to be paid in early instalments of 2% of Germany's annual output.
the occupation of the RuhrIn 1922, Germany failed to pay reparations. President Ebert tried negotiating, but France, needing to pay its war debts to the USA and lost patience. In January 1923, French and Belgian troops legally occupied the Ruhr to take reparations in raw materials and goods. The German government ordered a strike, but the French killed 100 workers and expelled 100,000 protesters. The strike halted industrial production, causing the collapse of the German currency.
hyperinflationDue to a lack of goods for trade, the Government resorted to printing money, paying off debts with worthless marks including war loans of over 2200 million. This led to hyperinflation making money practically worthless. Wages were paid daily instead of weekly. Middle-class Germans lost their savings' value rapidly as what could have bought a house in 1921, couldnt even buy a loaf of bread in 1923
stresseman came in to fix hyperinflationThe passive resistance in the Ruhr was ended. Worthless marks were called in and burned, replaced by the Rentenmark. American loans were secured under the Dawes Plan, and reparations payments were renegotiated. However, hyperinflation damaged the Weimar Government politically. Right-wing opponents blamed them for the crisis, linking it to the Treaty of Versailles and reparations. Many Germans never forgave the government.
Stresemanns achievements - the economyStresemann led Germany to prosperity through the Dawes Plan, which spread reparations and brought in US loans. Investments modernized industry and funded public works, creating jobs. By 1927, industry matched pre-war levels, making Germany the world's second-largest industrial power. Wages rose, living standards improved, and welfare benefits increased, driven by growing exports and stable finances.
Stresemanns achievements - politicsPolitics stabilized after 1923, with no attempted revolutions. Pro-Weimar parties gained support, with moderate parties securing 136 more Reichstag seats than radical ones by 1928. Hitler's Nazis received less than 3% of the vote in the 1928 election. Some parties that had cooperated in the 1918 revolution resumed cooperation, indicating growing acceptance of the Weimar Republic.
Stresemanns achievements - cultureCultural revival blossomed, fuelled by new freedoms of expression. Writers, poets, and artists flourished, particularly in Berlin. Some condemned political and business leaders, while other artworks depicted the traumas of war. The Bauhaus movement revolutionized design and architecture, rejecting tradition for innovation. German cinema thrived, introducing stars like Marlene Dietrich and directors like Fritz Lang.
Stresemanns achievements - foreign policyStresemann's foreign policy triumphs included signing the Locarno Treaties in 1925, ensuring stability by guaranteeing Germany's western borders. Germany's acceptance into the League of Nations in 1926 marked a diplomatic success. Quietly and steadily, Stresemann worked on reversing Treaty of Versailles terms, focusing on reparations and eastern frontiers. By his death in 1929, he negotiated the Young Plan, easing reparations, and secured the removal of foreign troops from the Rhineland.
Stresemanns failures - the economyThe economic boom in Weimar Germany was dependent on US loans, which could be recalled suddenly, leading to economic ruin. Workers in large industries saw improved pay and conditions, but rising unemployment, reaching 6% by 1928. Peasant farmers and parts of the middle class suffered, with overproduction and debt plaguing farmers, and small business owners feeling threatened by large department stores.
Stresemanns failures - politicsDespite relative political stability, Weimar Germany saw the growth of Nazi and Communist party organizations. Frequent changes in chancellors highlighted coalition fragility, while around 30% consistently voted against the Republic. Concerning, right-wing groups like the DNVP and Nazis collaborated, seeking respectability.
Stresemanns failures - cultureWeimar culture was vibrant to many, but for some in rural Germany, it symbolized moral decay. The Bauhaus design college relocated to Dessau due to hostility from Weimar officials. The Wandervogel movement emerged in response, advocating for a return to rural values and less urban decadence. This feeling was exploited later by the Nazis
Stresemanns failures - foreign policyStresemann faced criticism from nationalists for joining the League of Nations and signing the Locarno Pact, as it implied acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles. Communists also opposed Locarno, viewing it as a threat to the Soviet government.
history of Hitler and the Nazi party (1919-1921)The Nazis began as the German Worker's Party, led by Anton Drexler. In 1919 Hitler joined and Drexler realised he had talent and quickly put him in charge of propaganda. In 1920 the party announced its 25 point program and renamed itself the National Socialist German Workers Party or Nazis for short. In 1921 Hitler removed Drexler as leader. Hitler gave the people someone to blame for Germany's problems.
start of the SA/brownshirtsHitler's meetings were so successful his opponents tried to disrupt them, so Hitler set up the SA in 1921. They protected his meetings but also disrupted other parties meetings
The Munich PutschBy 1923, the Nazis, gained prominence despite being a minority. Capitalizing on the economic crisis, Hitler attempted a coup in November. He seized a Bavarian government meeting, announcing his takeover, with support from Ludendorff. SA seized official buildings, but government forces retaliated the next day. In a brief clash,16 Nazis were killed. The rebellion collapsed, with Hitler fleeing and Ludendorff captured. Hitler's gamble failed, marking a significant setback for the Nazis.
the aftermath of the Munich Putsch and Hitler's trialin the short-term, it was a disaster for Hitler, and he was humiliated. However, his trial gained massive publicity as everything he said was reported in newspapers. Hitler impressed the judge so much he got off with only 5 years, however only served 9 months and used this time to write Mein Kampf, Ludendorff freed altogether.
the Nazi's in the wildernessHitler realised that Nazis had to gain power through democracy before destroying it and after being released he started rebuilding the Nazi party. Hitler saw communists building up strength through youth organisations and recruitment drives so the Nazi's started doing the same. Their candidates stood in Reichstag elections for the first time in May 1924 and won 32 seats, which encouraged hitler, and he set up the Hitler Youth
a change in Nazi strategyin 1927 the Nazis were trying to appeal to German workers but they either supported socialists or communists. in the 1928 elections, the Nazis gained only 12 seats. they had failed to win over the workers.
the Nazis targeting the farmersWhile some segments of society thrived during Weimar Germany, others struggled. The Nazis found support among groups like peasant farmers and middle-class shopkeepers who felt left behind by economic progress. With about 35% of the population still rural, many felt excluded from prosperity. The Nazis appealed to peasants, promising aid and praising them as racially pure Germans. They contrasted rural simplicity with urban decadence, gaining support from conservatives who viewed Weimar culture as immoral.
strengthen the SA and the rise of the SSIn 1925, Hitler enlarged the SA. 55% of the SA were unemployed, and many were ex-servicemen from the war. He also set up the SS, loyal to him personally. By 1928, party membership rose to over 100,000
propaganda within the nazi partyJoseph Goebbels took charge of Nazi propaganda and was efficient. Him and Hitler believed the best way to reach 'the masses' was by appealing to their feelings not rationally. Goebbels produced posters, leaflets, films and radio broadcasts and organised rallies for 'photo opportunities'.
result of propaganda electorallyno electoral breakthrough. In 1928, they had the support of less than 3%. The success of Stresemann made Germans uninterested in extreme politics
the depressionIn 1929, the American stock market crash triggered a global economic depression. Germany was hit hard, with American losses prompting demands for repayment of loans, leading to economic collapse. Bankruptcies soared, workers were laid off, and unemployment surged. Compounded by reparations from the Treaty of Versailles, Germany faced severe challenges. The government tries to act but the Weimar Constitution, with its careful balance of power, made firm and decisive action by the government difficult.
enter the Nazi's during the great depressionHitler's ideas were now relevant - the Weimar government is indecisive? Germany needs a strong leader, reparations adding to Germany problem? kick out of ToV, unemployment is a problem? let them join the army. The 25 point plan was attractive to the unemployed, elderly and the middle class. Hitler gave everyone someone to blame for Germany's problems. He got support for these now as the democratic parties couldn't get Germany back to work.
Nazi election results during the depressionIn the 1930 elections the Nazis gained 107 seats and in November 1932 they got nearly 200. They didn't have an overall majority, but they were the biggest single party.
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - Nazi campaigningHitler was amazing at campaigning. He ran for president in 1932 despite losing his profile was raised hugely, Nazi posters and pamphlets were found everywhere. Nazi rallies impresses people with their energy, enthusiasm and size. They relied on generalised slogans to avoid being clear on what it meant in terms of policies. This made it hard to criticize them, but if they were criticized for a policy, it would be dropped. Nazis also organised soup kitchens and provided shelter in hostels for unemployed
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - negative cohesionpeople supported Nazis not because they shared Nazi views, but because they shared Nazi fears
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - disillusionment with democracyPoliticians were unable to tackle the problems of the depression. When the depression started, Chancellor Bruning cut government spending and welfare benefits and urged Germans to make sacrifices. Bruning called new elections in 1930 which was a bad decision as it gave the Nazis the opportunity to exploit the discontent in Germany. Unemployment was heading towards 6 million, and the average German's income had fallen by 40% since 1929.
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - the communist threatAs the economic crisis deepened, Communist support surged, which the Nazis exploited by leveraging 'fear of communism.' Street clashes between communist gangs and police escalated, contrasting with the disciplined image of the SA and SS. Business leaders, alarmed by the prospect of state control and growing trade union strength, saw the Nazis as protection. Farmers, wary of communist land seizures, looked to the Nazis for support amid their struggles.
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - decadenceThe Nazi's counted on all those who felt traditional German values were under threat. The Nazis talked about restoring these old-fashioned values
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - weak oppositionThe Social Democratic Party thought Germans wouldn't fall for vague promises. They also failed to work with other parties like the communists. Eberts crushing of the communists in 1919-1920 left lots of bitter memories and the Nazis exploited divisions among their opponents
Why did the Nazis succeed in elections - the resultNazi support rocketed. Especially, middle class Germans supported Hitler in villages, towns and cities across Germany. In rural communities, the Nazis gained many votes from those who shared their views about the decadent cities.
How did Hitler become chancellorFollowing the July 1932 elections, the Nazis secured 230 seats, making them the largest party but lacking a majority. Despite Hitler's demand for chancellorship, Hindenburg, suspicious of him, refused. In December 1932, Hindenburg appointed Kurt von Schleicher instead. However, in January 1933, seeking Reichstag support, Hindenburg reluctantly appointed Hitler after secret negotiations. Hitler's chancellorship resulted from a behind-the-scenes deal with German aristocrats, who naively believed they could control him.
The Reichstag FireHitler called for another election for March 1933 to try to get an overall majority, however this was not at all guaranteed. February 27th the Reichstag building burnt down. Hitler blamed the communists and said it was the beginning of an uprising. He demanded 'special emergency powers' and was granted them. The Nazis used these powers to arrest communists, break up meetings and frighten voters.
The enabling actThe Nazis won their largest ever share and with the help of the Nationalist Party Hitler had an overall majority. Using the SA and the SS, he intimidated the Reichstag into passing the enabling act, and only the SPD voted against him. after the election, the communists had been banned. This made Hitler a virtual dictator. For the next 4 years, if Hitler wanted a new law, he could just pass it. However, Hitler's power was not fully consolidated yet.
The night of the long knivesWithin a year, opponents of the Nazis had either left Germany or been taken to concentration camps. The army did not trust the SA or its leader Ernst Rohm and neither did Hitler as he feared his control over the 4 million SA men. On the weekend of 29-30 June, squads of SS men killed Rohm and other leading figures in the SA and arrested them. Hitler accused Rohm of plotting to overthrow and murder him. Over the weekend, Rohm and as many as 400 others were executed, including former chancellor Von schleicher.
The army oathHindenburg died on the 2nd of August 1934 and Hitler took over as Führer. On the same day, the entire army swore an oath to Hitler. They agreed to stay out of politics and to serve Hitler. In return, Hitler spent a lot on rearmament, bought back conscription and made plans to make Germany a great military power again.